ISSN 0974-3618 www.rjptonline.org
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Improved Pharmacokinetic Parameters of
Acyclovir in Rats
Kishore Uttam Kothule*, Suresh Kumar
Gidwani, Paraag Gide
Jawaharlal Nehru
Technological University, Hyderabad, India
*Corresponding Author E-mail: kothule@rediffmail.com
ABSTRACT:
The purpose of the present investigation is
to develop and characterize Acyclovir oral suspension in which Acyclovir is
present in nanoparticle form manufactured using chitosan through ionic gelation
method and test oral bioavailability in Rats. Methods of manufacturing and characterization of Chitosan nanoparticles
of acyclovir was previously discussed. In continuation to earlier
research work acyclovir nanoparticles were incorporated in oral suspension
dosage form. Finished oral nanosuspension was characterized and pharmacokinetic
parameters were studied in Rats. Pharmacokinetic parameters of nano suspension
were compared with pharmacokinetic parameters of marketed suspension.
Improvement in Cmax and AUC values revealed improvement in absorption of
acyclovir in Rats.
KEYWORDS: Nanoparticles, Acyclovir,
Chitosan, Ionic gelation method, Nano suspension.
INTRODUCTION:
Viruses are the ultimate expression of
parasitism: they not only take nutrition from the host cell but also direct its
metabolic machinery to synthesize new virus particles. Viral chemotherapy,
therefore, is difficult, as it would require interference with cellular metabolism
in the host1. The most convenient and commonly employed route of
drug delivery has historically been by oral ingestion2. Drugs that
are easily absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and having a short half
life are eliminated quickly from the blood circulation. However, the intestinal
epithelium may constitute a permeability barrier for the absorption of orally
administered drugs. This problem stimulated a search for new strategies to
overcome mucosal barriers. Among various approaches, the ability of colloidal
systems (liposomes, nanoparticles and polymeric micelles) to cross the
intestinal mucosa has been investigated extensively3. Also the
enhancements of electrostatic interaction between the mucosal surfaces and drug
have a marked effect on their uptake and overall bioavailability. Nanoparticles
are defined as solid, submicron-sized drug carrier that may or may not be
biodegradable. The term nanoparticle is a collective name for both nanospheres
have a matrix type of structure or encapsulated within the particle4.
Nanoparticles composed of physiologically tolerated lipid components, at room
temperature the particles are in the solid state.
Received on 09.12.2014 Modified on 30.12.2014
Accepted on 04.01.2015 © RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech.
8(1): Jan. 2015; Page 35-37
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2015.00007.4
The purpose of the present investigation is
to develop acyclovir loaded nanoparticles using chitosan polymer through ionic
gelation method and to improve oral bioavailability acyclovir drug by
incorporating into nanoparticles5.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS:
Acyclovir
was received as gift sample from Indoco Remedies Rabale, Navi Mumbai. Chitosan
was purchased from India Sea Foods, Cochin. Acetic acid and Tween 80 were
purchased from SD Fine chemical Ltd, Mumbai. Methanol and ethanol were
purchased from Qualigens fine chemicals, Mumbai. Potassium Chloride and
Hydrochloric acid were purchased from Ranbaxy Fine Chemicals Ltd., New Delhi.
Sorbitol solution, 70% non crystalline, Glycerol, Dispersible cellulose, Methyl
parahydroxy benzoate, Propyl parahydroxy benzoate free samples were supplied by
Indoco Remedies Rabale. And all other chemicals were of reagent grade and used
without further modification.
Methods:
Preparation of
Acyclovir nanoparticles using chitosan 6
Drug loaded chitosan nanoparticles were
prepared by the method reported by Calvo et al. (1997b) with some modifications
based on the ionic gelation of acyclovir with TPP anions. Chitosan was
dissolved in acetic aqueous solution (6 % v/v) at various concentrations such
as 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0 and 5.0 mg/ml. 10 mg of drug (acyclovir) was dissolved in
5 ml of 2 % w/v tween 80 solution, which was added to the chitosan solution.
Under magnetic stirring at room temperature, 5 ml of 0.25 % sodium
tripolyphosphate (TPP) aqueous solution was added drop wise into drug and
polymeric mixture, respectively. The stirring was continued for about 20 – 25
min. The obtained nanoparticle suspension was centrifuged at 12000x rpm for 30
min using C24 centrifuge. The formation of the particle was a result of the
interaction between the negative groups of the TPP and the positively charged
amino groups of chitosan (ionic gelation).
Formulation plan
for Acyclovir nanoparticles using chitosan
|
Batch |
Formula |
||
|
Drug (Acyclovir) (mg) |
0.25 % TPP solution (ml) |
10 ml Polymer (Chitosan) solution (%) |
|
|
FM –
1 |
10 |
5 |
0.1 |
|
FM –
2 |
10 |
5 |
0.2 |
|
FM –
3 |
10 |
5 |
0.3 |
|
FM –
4 |
10 |
5 |
0.4 |
|
FM –
5 |
10 |
5 |
0.5 |
Formulation of
Acyclovir nanoparticles suspension:
Charge approximately 5% of the final batch
volume of Purified water at 20±3şC to a suitable vessel equipped with a mixer
propeller. Add dispersible cellulose to the above purified water and mix until
dissolved. Then re-circulate the mixture in microfluidizer. After that add 7% of
the final batch volume of purified water to above solution and mix for 5
minutes. Then add acyclovir loaded nanoparticles to the vessel with constant
mixing. Continue mixing until it is fully dispersed. Add methyl parahydroxy
benzoate and propyl parahydroxy benzoate to it and mix for approximately 5
minutes. Add sorbitol solution slowly with constant mixing. Continue to mix
after addition of the sorbitol solution. Then add glycerin with constant mixing
and mix for 5 minutes. Eventually add the flavors and mix for approximately
five minutes. Add purified water and make up to the final volume and then mix
until a uniform suspension is attained.
Manufacturing formula of Batch No.
R&D/05/13
|
Sr.No |
Ingredient |
Qty Per Dosage (mg/ml) |
|
1. |
Acyclovir
loaded nanoparticles |
Equivalent
to 40 mg of Acyclovir |
|
2. |
Sorbitol
solution, 70% non crystalline |
350.000 |
|
3. |
Glycerol |
100.000 |
|
4. |
Dispersible
cellulose |
25.000 |
|
5. |
Methyl
parahydroxy benzoate |
0.004 |
|
6. |
Propyl
parahydroxy benzoate |
0.002 |
|
7. |
Flavour
banana |
0.005 |
|
8. |
Vanillin |
0.005 |
|
9. |
Purified
Water |
Q.s.
to add 1 ml |
Final
batch was charged for Stability study up to 6 months as per ICH guidelines.
Evaluation of
Acyclovir loaded nanoparticles suspension:
a. Particle size:
Particle size analysis was done by scanning
electron microscopy (SEM). SEM is the most commonly used method for
characterizing drug delivery system, due to simplicity in sample preparation
and ease of operation. Three dimensional information about macro (0.1-10 mm),
meso (1-100 µm) and nanostructure (10-1,000 nm), is often found within the same
micrograph. SEM has been used to determine particle size, distribution, surface
topography, texture and to examine the morphology of fractured or sectioned
surface.
Particle size analysis was done by using
JEOL JSM-T330A scanning microscope. Cleaned brass specimen stud was used for
mounting the samples. Solvent paint was applied on these stud and while the
paint was wet, the pellets were placed on each stud and allowed to dry, then
the sample was observed in scanning electron microscopy and photographs were
taken.
b. pH:
pH of final suspension was measured on thermolab digital pH meter
at room temperature.
c. Sedimentation volume:
Physical stability is defined as the condition in which the
particles remain uniformly distributed throughout the dispersion without any
signs of sedimentation. Therefore the extent of sedimentation and ease of
redispersibility evaluated by sedimentation volume method.
It is defined as ratio of ultimate volume of the sediment to
initial volume of the suspension. Normally sedimentation value is between 0
to1. The higher the value, the better is the physical stability.
d. Viscosity:
The viscosity of the optimized nanosuspension was determined by
using Brookfield DV-E Rheometer (Brookfield Engineering, Middleboro, MA, USA)
using a spindle no.00 in triplicate at 25°C. The speed of the
spindle was adjusted to 100 rpm. Wait time for the operation was 50 min. Shear
rate applied was 413 per min and diameter of the spindle used was 50 mm (R.
Parveen et al. 2011, V. Bali et al. 2010).
In vivo Biodistribution Studies of Final batch:
All animal experiments were approved and
performed in accordance with the guidelines of by Institutional Animal Ethics
Committee (Ref No. METIP/IAEC/2011-2012/25). Male Sprague Dawley rats weighing
250–270 g were selected for the biodistribution studies which were divided into
two group, one for oral administration of Test sample and another for oral
administration of marketed sample. To Group I, 5 ml of the formulation (200
mg/5ml DRUG loaded nanosuspesion) were given with the help of micropipette
attached with LDPE tubing, having 0.1 mm internal diameter. The rats were held
from the back in slanted position during administration. The blood was
collected using syringe. Blood samples were anticoagulated with heparin and
centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min to obtain plasma. At each time point, 6 rats
were taken for measurements. All plasma samples were stored for up to 48 hr in
a deep freezer (−700 C) until HPLC analysis (Zhang Q. et al.,
2004).
A. Processing of samples:
The
whole procedure was carried out at room temperature. To 200 µl plasma samples
25 µl of the Internal Standard (40 µg /ml) was spiked and vortex mixed for 30
s. Then 0.5 ml of acetonitrile was added and vortex-mixed for 1 min. The sample
was centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 5 min in a microcentrifuge. The supernatant
layer (0.75 ml) was transferred to a 15 ml glass test tube, and then 4.5 ml of
extraction solvent, methyl t-butyl ether– n-hexane (9:1) were added. The sample
was vortex-mixed for 3 min using a multi-tube vortexer. The organic layer (4
ml) was quantitatively transferred to a 6 ml glass tube and evaporated to
dryness using an evaporator at 40 0C under a stream of nitrogen.
Then the dried extract was reconstituted in 100 µl of water–methanol (50:50,
v/v; diluent) and a 20 µl aliquot was injected into chromatographic system
(Mudigonda, K et. al., 2006).
B. Chromatographic conditions:
The chromatographic separation
was performed at ambient temperature with a reversed-phase, 150 X 4 mm base
specific column packed with 5µm C18 silica reversed-phase particles
(Lichrospher 60 Select B). The mobile phase was a mixture of 10 mm ammonium
acetate buffer–acetonitrile (45:55, v/v) pumped at a flow-rate of 1.0 mL/min.
Detection was performed at a wavelength of 240 nm.
C. Calibration curves of Drug in plasma:
Calibration curves of DRUG were
prepared with plasma spiked with known amounts of the drug utilizing its HPLC
peak area ratio to the internal standard. The linear range of DRUG was 500–5000
ng/ml, 500–5000 ng/g for plasma samples. The detection limits were 100 ng/ml
(or 100 ng/g).
D. Data analysis:
All data are reported
as mean ± S.D and the difference between the groups were tested using Student’s
t-test at the level of P < 0.05. All concentration data were dose- and
weight- normalized. Pharmacokinetic parameters for drug formulations were calculated using Kinetica
5.0 software. The Cmax and Tmax values of the oral
administration were read directly from the concentration–time profile. The area
under the concentration–time curve (AUC0 →t) was calculated by
the trapezoidal rule. The absolute oral bioavailability of drug from
nanosuapension was calculated.
RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION:
Following table
describes the results of test samples and marketed samples for each test
performed during the production of the Suspension.
|
Sr.
No |
Test |
Results
for test samples |
Results
for marketed sample |
|
1. |
Particle
size |
250-300
nm |
10000
– 15000 nm |
|
2. |
pH |
6.1 |
5-7 |
|
3. |
Viscosity |
64 cp |
65 cP |
|
4. |
Sedimentation
volume |
0.8-1.0 |
0.8-1.0 |
Stability results up to 6 months
for accelerated, intermediate and long term conditions was found to be
satisfactory.
In vivo study results:
The results of biodistribution
studies showed the time profile of Drug concentration in plasma higher for
nanosuspension compare to marketed sample. The profiles of Acyclovir level in
plasma displayed an initial absorption phase and maximum concentration achieved
after about 4.5±1 hrs in plasma for Nanosuspension while 2.5±1 hrs in marketed
sample.
|
Pharmacokinetic
parameters |
Sample |
Nano-suspension |
Marketed sample |
|
Cmax (ng/ml) |
Blood Plasma |
300.66±47.0 |
205.20±39.0 |
|
Tmax (hrs) |
Blood Plasma |
4.5±1 |
2.0±1 |
|
AUC0-12 hrs (ng/ml*min) |
Blood Plasma |
9457±843 |
5124±712 |
CONCLUSION:
The
present investigation was aimed at developing and characterizing oral
suspension of chitosan-acyclovir nanoparticles and to improve oral
bioavailability. Physical characterization and stability data showed that final
formulation was stable and drug is in nano form. In vivo study results
confirmed increase in extent of absorption of Acyclovir in rats. From the above
studies, it is revealed that the present work was a satisfactory preliminary
study of improving bioavailability using chitosan nanoparticles. Clinical study
in humans can be done using this formulation for the further study.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:
Kishore
Uttam Kothule would like to thanks IIT, Powai for providing facilities to
perform SEM studies. The authors would also like to acknowledge Indoco Remedies
Rabale, Navi Mumbai India, for providing the gift samples of Acyclovir and
other excipeints. The authors are again grateful to Indoco Remedies Rabale,
Navi Mumbai and MET’s college for extending facilities to perform various
experimental and analytical studies.
REFRENCES:
1.
Tripathi KD. Essentials of Medical
Pharmacology. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd, New Delhi. 2008; 6th
ed: pp. 767-779.
2.
Thanco BC, Sunny MC and Jayakrishnan.
Oral sustained release drug delivery systems using polycarbonate microspheres
capable of floating on gastric fluid. J Pharm Pharmacol. 45; 1993:21-24.
3.
Ahlin P, Kristi J and Vercer F.
Investigation of polymeric nanoparticles as carriers of oral administration. Int
J Pharm. 239; 2002: 113-120.
4.
Rao GCS et al. Advances in
nanoparticulate drug delivery systems. Indian drugs. 41(7);
2004:389-390.
5.
Pandey R et al. Nanoencapsulation of
azole antifungals: Potential application to improve oral drug delivery. Int
J Pharm. 301;2005:268-276.
6.
Kothule KU, Keshrwani P., Gidwani SK and
Gide P. Research J. Pharm. and Tech.
3(4); Oct-Dec 2010:1241.